Our Sponsors
 Moderator  ~PHP Nuke User~  Posts: 351 Staff Next Group: 149 posts 
Eric wrote: Jordan, That's not gonna work with the forums. Least I cannot find a way to edit it correctly. 
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:38 pm  Site Admin  ~PHP Nuke User~ Posts: 3324 Staff Next Group: 1676 posts
admin(Mark) wrote: how is phpnuke fusion working out for everyone? If it catches on I will take a look at porting the subscription module. Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:59 pm Moderator ~PHP Nuke User~ Posts: 351 Staff Next Group: 149 posts
Eric wrote: I like it. Nuke currently has more and better features but Fusion is also a good CMS. Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:25 am Moderator ~PHP Nuke User~ Posts: 351 Staff Next Group: 149 posts
Eric wrote: Also, you seem to be good with the "programming" end, Mark. If I sent you the Fusion forums and you looked at the source code to the site I am trying, you think you can make it happen? Jordan pointed out it's DYNAMIC HTML in the source, so it might be easy for you. Not that far in college yet and don't wanna rip what's left if my hair out. 
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:28 am  Dedicated Users  ~PHP Nuke User~ Posts: 177 Next Group: 323 posts
sinnzofthasoul wrote: Mark, I'd be willing to pay for the mod if you converted it. Right now, there's only a donations/paypal mod for Fusion, and Nuke might have alot of mods, but I wouldn't necessarily call them better. Everyone loves "features", but let's face it. Most only activate them just to have them. A lot is wasted, at least for me. I think Fusion is a great source for those sticking to general uses and it's rated #1 by opensourcecms.com. This is by user votes. I think it speaks for itself. It's a great portal IMO and in time, it'll catch on and probably offer as many "USEFUL" mods as Nuke. Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:52 pm
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in
