websiteportals wrote:

i been using nuke for many years had some prety big sites and still do.
like i 7th for the best music omd.
and atm i been forking phpnuke pure smarty based cms complete rewite of everything i even rewrote smarty and its now called virtual templates.

cut the story short i had many chats via phone or email with chatserv and his asked me for help with patched,

quake who started the 3.x branch now works on nuke distro called evo and will no longer have the time for patches.

chatserv has gone back full time into work again and will not have much time for patches i been asked to start the 4.x branch and also 3.2 code changes for anyone who has modded there site.

does this mean nuke will die.

the last few nukes fb released are so bad that many refuse to use or support it 77 - 79

i was working for fb 8.0x branch but when i reliesed what he wanted and he was paying so liitle to make fully fledged forums like phpbb, memberslist, pm modules etc for $6k

some may of took it but i make more then that with my webhosting with 4 servers and over 600 clients

and that was 3 month project and would not pay until it was done where i done projects on rent acoder atlest there was some funds upfront

so what do you think the future of nuke

could explain also why i fork now....

many thanks

steve

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:58 pm

newuser wrote:

I think nuke is almost dead, and that joomla is really the new wave of CMS. Its sad, since my site is so modded now that it would be almost impossible for me to migrate over to joomla. Nuke is just way out of date, not very user friendly, and has to many security holes to even mention.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:51 pm

websiteportals wrote:

yea i know like for starters nuke so called security code is pointless
i can bypass that.
and the phpbb is poor security as well
i been recoding nuke over a year now and almost ready for first previews.
and original cms and you can easily mirgrate but i had to drop every single nuke table to recode that into values and name type tables.

one thing i hated about nuke was the db for example

nuke config

18+ tables if you just want to fetch $sitename you quering all these tables reguardless

with fetch value where name you only query 1 table.

and then all the badly coded modules all the excess queries mounting over 175+ queres.

causing load on mysql

you can just tell this guy has very little codeing experence

thatware if anyone ever seen has not changed much at all to phpnuke now

most of the modules have remained the same since it was thatware

and when nuke when modular back in 6.x branch many cms started forking in like mambo, postnuke etc

just shows where he started to go down hill all the way i started forking nuke since 7.7 was released when i saw how mad the tinymce was causing so many problems it was not sanatised correcly causing many security issues

and opened all those security issues that was closed in 7.6 branch now became open again

and he things removing some of the plughins would stop it

well he was wrong has not made much of a diffference at but made things worse

thanks

steve

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:25 pm

gottalovenuke wrote:

how much trouble would it be to convert this subscription module to joomla?
I had a nuke site ready to go but I dind't want to deal with the numerous security issues.

Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:18 am