Eric wrote:

Probably why it's associated with "Nuke".... PHP-Nuke, Postnuke, etc. all came from the same open source coding and then updated. That's what I get out of it but could be wrong. The creator of Fusion I think started from scratch.

Fusion has many many mods (also known as infusions for this CMS) you can add that act the same as the nuke sites. One they didn't have is a Subscription one and that is why I requested one from Mark. He's a good scripter and was hoping he could help me out.

Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:12 pm

sinnzofthasoul wrote:

and Fusion themes are relatively easy to create. I've been working on some and have a few posted already on my site. I love it and pretty much quit Nuke. Greatest feature of all.... it doesn't CRASH if you make an error.

Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 12:03 am

godfirst wrote:

I will look into the "easy" to make themes..lol

I'm not exactly a programmer or anything, and basically I can do the hacks/mods and add-ons by reading the directions, but if it's a good thing, and secure I'll try it.

Q?
Can you port from phpnuke to php-fusion. I may re-open my site under nuke, but switch to fusion later if I figure out how to get a good theme like the one I have ported.

Thanks

Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 10:19 am

websiteportals wrote:

i prefer to fork nuke as my cms is the only (oo cms) object oriented cms
the resources are shared so you are not calling the function over and over
90% of the system runs of classes and best part you can extend a class without breaking the current class like "class members extends admins"
and you can add a new function to admins

i have a online theme editor and also dreamweaver templates.
or you could just edit the html files

and release date for the cms is around june 1st

thanks

steve

Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 11:56 am